What do you listen for in a sermon? What is the practice of Christian preaching really intended for?
In answering this question we should be wary of at least two common errors. Both of these errors have to do with shifting what is secondary and peripheral to the center. (I’ll address one error now and the second in a later post.)
1.Moralism
Probably the most common misconception about Christian preaching, often purveyed by preachers as well as parishioners, is that we preachers are supposed to be telling people what to do all the time. We have all heard sermons which simply offer a laundry list of good things to do and say and think. But this is not the primary purpose of Christian proclamation.
Of course we do want people to come away with a sense of purpose and direction and even some specific applications in mind. But if all we do is feed instructions for good-living, then our message will be sub-Christian.
The problem with moralizing is that it draws more attention to ourselves than to God. We come away thinking mostly about how we might remake ourselves as better people. Bryan Chapell* calls this “sola bootstrapsa” preaching because you’re basically asking people to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. It is the antithesis of sola gratia and sola fide and solus Christus.
(*see http://worldwidefreeresources.com/upload/49776585727ca.pdf)
Eugene Peterson (in video above) is right to insist that Christian preaching must, instead, focus on God. This is what makes our message good news, i.e. gospel. We openly declare the works of God before men. We want people to know that God has done something and is doing things which we could never accomplish for ourselves. “Sola bootstrapsa” messages are non-redemptive because they leave us to rely upon our own power.
There is nothing distinctively Christian about trying to live a moral life. There is no substantial power in mere morals. Most people have some sense of right and wrong. Most people desire to live by some kind of positive standard. Most people also fail to meet their own standards, and, what is worse, readily betray them.
However much our own morals may deviate from the commands of God, however much we may desperately need moral correction, however much we may delude ourselves in calling what is evil, good, and what is good, evil, and however new habits may help us to get along better in life, yet what we really need runs deeper than moral correction. We need new hearts.
We can find power for this kind of transformation only in connection to the One who has already died and been raised, the only truly Righteous One who is ascended and now reigns. The love of God leads us beyond moral transformation. And it is sacrificial love that remains the motivating factor for Christian witness and Christian living and Christian proclamation. God’s sacrificial love, not ours. The gospel of Jesus Christ does not simply call us to repent. Instead, the biblical gospel insists God loves us so much that he sent Jesus to suffer and die, to accept judgement on our behalf, and thereby to enable our repentance. God has come to rescue us. God makes a way for new life. So that we might learn to love again as he does.
In this the love of God was made manifest among us, that God sent his only Son into the world, so that we might live through him. In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God abides in us and his love is perfected in us. (1 John 4:9-12; ESV)
Our morals do need redirection, but we need motivation that runs deeper than our own energies. This is why we need the gospel proclamation, the kerygma, in Christian preaching. Humanity needs a Savior, and we have One. It is far better news than mere moral instruction.
Therefore, as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him, rooted and built up in him and established in the faith, just as you were taught, abounding in thanksgiving.
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority. In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead. And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.
Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God.
If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations- “Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch” (referring to things that all perish as they are used)- according to human precepts and teachings? These have indeed an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-made religion and asceticism and severity to the body, but they are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh. (Colossians 2:6 – 23; ESV, emphasis mine)
Paul goes on to sharply challenge his readers in the next chapter to “put to death therefore” (3:5) all sorts of wicked vices and to “put on” (3:12) an assortment of Christian virtues instead. Of course the church wants to see moral transformation; we just don’t believe we can get there on our own, and we don’t believe morality is an end in itself. That’s the difference between kerygma and moral instruction.
by: Parker Scott James